Comments on: More fun beating a dead horse http://thecarruthfamily.com/michael/archives/2004/12/01/more-fun-beating-a-dead-horse/ Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:20:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Mark Patton http://thecarruthfamily.com/michael/archives/2004/12/01/more-fun-beating-a-dead-horse/comment-page-1/#comment-155 Mark Patton Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://thecarruthfamily.com/michael/index.php/archives/2004/12/01/more-fun-beating-a-dead-horse/#comment-155 <p>There he goes again. You see folks what my mislead friend has declined to tell you is that the current administration is just playing the same game the democrats started back in August in an effort to try and mislead the American public into believing that to be a real American you must follow the "decorated war veteran" not the "power hungry, ass whipping republican." Im sure Kerry mentioned his war record somewhere during his campaign, right!?</p> <p>Its the same song and dance, they try one tactic it fails or back fires in their face so then they feel the need to turn around and accuse their opposition of practicing the same tactics.</p> <p>No one has ever said, in the current administration, that you must stand by and follow the President without question. Perhaps those out there that think that is the current administration's policy are unable to think for themselves and therefore have accepted what the democratic party has fed them over the past few months as fact. Im reminded of a quote, I my friend here will recognize it..."Their coathanger halos, they dont come cheap...From television shepards with living room sheep.";)</p> <p>No, I dont think that you have to follow the president without question. I dont even think you have to respect him as a person, if you choose not to. Perhaps, openly insulting our President and the American "way of life" during a time of war (yes my tree hugging friends, wether you like it or not, it is a WAR) is not the smartest thing to so or the best way to support the men and women fighting on our behalf.</p> <p>I figured that you people thought patriotism was defined by how many of your fellow soldiers you left behind or how many enemy combatants you shot in the back as they ran away. Oh no, wait that was last month's definition, we are still awaiting this month's "New and Improved" definition.</p> There he goes again. You see folks what my mislead friend has declined to tell you is that the current administration is just playing the same game the democrats started back in August in an effort to try and mislead the American public into believing that to be a real American you must follow the “decorated war veteran” not the “power hungry, ass whipping republican.” Im sure Kerry mentioned his war record somewhere during his campaign, right!?

Its the same song and dance, they try one tactic it fails or back fires in their face so then they feel the need to turn around and accuse their opposition of practicing the same tactics.

No one has ever said, in the current administration, that you must stand by and follow the President without question. Perhaps those out there that think that is the current administration’s policy are unable to think for themselves and therefore have accepted what the democratic party has fed them over the past few months as fact. Im reminded of a quote, I my friend here will recognize it…”Their coathanger halos, they dont come cheap…From television shepards with living room sheep.”;)

No, I dont think that you have to follow the president without question. I dont even think you have to respect him as a person, if you choose not to. Perhaps, openly insulting our President and the American “way of life” during a time of war (yes my tree hugging friends, wether you like it or not, it is a WAR) is not the smartest thing to so or the best way to support the men and women fighting on our behalf.

I figured that you people thought patriotism was defined by how many of your fellow soldiers you left behind or how many enemy combatants you shot in the back as they ran away. Oh no, wait that was last month’s definition, we are still awaiting this month’s “New and Improved” definition.

]]>